Home Other Methods

Other Methods

Be Aware of Other Methods of Advertising Fraud

Be Aware of Other Methods of Advertising Fraud

Manipulation of Standards
 
 
Sometimes, the standards required for any given product to be presented with a certain label are easily manipulated through the vagueness of those standards. These are situations in which the widespread understanding of a certain term can be used against the consumer, so that the consumer will come to believe false claims about a given product.
 
 
The unfortunate fact is that often times, these false claims are not genuinely false, as the companies making these claims will often gladly define exactly what they are trying to say, and will make it perfectly clear that they were not, in fact, using the same definition as is used in that widespread fashion.
 
 
This does not prevent customers from simply assuming that such deceptive advertisements are using the widespread definition, however, and as a result, these customers may make a mistake in deciding to purchase a product based on an assumed fact. As a primary example of this, technology companies Seagate and Western Digital both put out computer hard drives claiming to hold a certain amount of space, as measured in gigabytes or terabytes.
 
 
But the terabytes and gigabytes that Seagate and Western Digital were referring to in these advertised claims were not the terabytes and gigabytes that are used by most computers and software.
 
 
Another primary method of false advertising, which doesn't quite fall into the domain of blatant, outright lying, is that of fillers and over-sized packaging. These two methods are both ways of physically manipulating the appearance of a product, such that the consumer will be more inclined to purchase it.
 
 
Fillers are a way of "filling in" the product with cheap, unimportant substance, giving the overall product a bulked up appearance, without significantly changing the product from what it would be if you stripped out all the filler. Over-sized packaging is dependent upon appearances, as the purpose of over-sized packaging is simply to make the overall product seem more abundant by making the packaging itself seem larger. Neither is false advertising in a clearly prosecutable fashion; filler sometimes does have some benefit to it, such as extra fiber included in dog food helping out with digestion, and there may be no false claims on the filler-laden product.
 
 
Similarly, over-sized packaging is not lying in any clear way, as no company will have made the claim that the product must fill the packaging entirely, without any additional padding of any kind. But the fact remains that both of these techniques are attempts to manipulate consumers into purchasing products which they might otherwise have ignored. For more information on the methods and nature of fillers and over-sized packaging, click the link.
 
 
Using undefined terms in false advertising refers to the practice of using words which appear to have content or meaning to describe a given product. These words likely have no consistent meaning, however, and instead are simply buzz words designed to catch the attention of a consumer and then imply certain facts about a product, without actually ever once making a substantive claim.
 
 
The use of undefined terms cannot be held against advertisers because of the very nature of the undefined terms; using them is not making any clear, substantive claim, and as a result, marketing campaigns that use such terms cannot be held accountable for consumer interpretations of those terms (or at least, so goes the defense of the advertising companies). For instance, the term "light" is used very frequently on many different kinds of products
 
 
 Its actual meaning for any given product is highly indeterminate, and a company can defend the use of the term with a claim relating to the color of the product, as opposed to anything more substantive. Therefore, if a consumer were to "misinterpret" the term "light" as something relating to caloric content of the product, then that would be the consumer's fault, not the company's, as "light" was still a perfectly applicable term. To learn more about how some companies use undefined terms to better sell their products, follow the link.
 
 
"Small Print"
 
 
The use of small print as a technique for false advertising is a fairly common means of sidestepping federal rules. Advertisers must put all pertinent information into their ads, but there is no rule describing exactly how they must present or provide such information. As a result, many advertisers simply present the necessary information through small print, designed to be nigh illegible and unnoticeable, while also offering up ample other distractions in the advertisement to further prevent the viewer from paying attention to the small print.
 
 
Most consumers are also unlikely to pay attention to any given ad to the extent necessary for both perceiving and understanding the contents of the small print, and therefore will simply ignore the small print in favor of looking at the larger, generally positive message contained in the large print of the ad.
 
 
Inside the small print, then, an advertiser can hide any number of highly important pieces of information, including information on what terms need be fulfilled before the more prominently advertised deal actually comes into effect, and how long the advertised deal would last. For more on small print and the information it might work to conceal in plain sight, click the link. 

Understanding Fillers and Over sized Packaging

Understanding Fillers and Over sized Packaging

Some forms of deceptive advertising 
 
Deceptive advertising uses fillers primarily to make consumers think they are purchasing something more valuable than it actually is, by bulking up its size without keeping its quality consistent.
 
 
A primary example of such deceptive advertising is in pet food, as fillers are often used in the food in order to simply bulk up the size of the pellet and the overall amount of food being produced at a lowered cost to the manufacturer. Non-nutrient ingredients are often included in animal food as filler, simply in order to increase the food size, so that consumer perception of the food and its value will similarly increase.
 
 
Such non-nutrient ingredients are not entirely without value, of course, as they do add fiber to the food, which some pet dietitians believe is important for the pet's health. But other dietitians have argued in the opposite, that most filler is actually low-grade fiber that does nothing to help with the overall nutrition of the food, and actually can hurt the animal more than it can help.
 
 
The use of filler often does not correlate to false claims, either. A pet food company might still be able to claim that a given pet food product does, actually, contain certain components, without that claim being diminished by the presence of filler in the food. As long as the pet food company does not, for instance, say that certain things are included in the pet food that are not really there, or say that there is a certain ratio of components which is false, thanks to the filler, then the company will have made no false claims. This is part of the reason why filler is actually a dangerous element for the consumer attempting to see past deceptive advertising.
 
 
Over-sized packaging is something of the inverse of filler, but it is a similar form of deceptive advertising. Instead of bulking up the product itself with unnecessary, non-beneficial components, the packaging is simply bulked up, as a simulation of the presence of filler. Imagine that, instead of a dog food bag being primarily filled with pellets, 75% of which are filler, you instead put into the dog bag only those parts of the pellets which are clearly and inarguably good for the dog.
 
 
You would then have to pad out the size of the bag in order to convince the consumer that he or she is still buying a valuable amount of product, as distilling the actual healthful elements of dog food would likely lead to a significantly reduced overall product size. Over-sized packaging is deceptive advertising based on this principle, and it makes the implicit false claim that there is more product within the packaging than there would appear to be.

Undefined Terms Defined

Undefined Terms Defined

One of the plights of the modern consumer is the use of undefined terms in false advertising
 
 
But the fact that the National Organic Program was necessary in order to prevent the misuse of this term simply points out another critical element of the misuse of undefined terms. Advertising law does not clearly delineate which terms are defined and usable in advertising (see also manipulation of standards 
 
 
Some advertising laws were focused on attempting to eliminate the use of certain undefined terms, when such terms clearly had an element of implication to them, and that implication was also improper. For instance, undefined terms were a favorite advertising tactic of the tobacco industry, as such terms as "low tar" or "ultra-light" were used to describe cigarettes without meaning anything substantive.
 
 
The terms were pure advertising catchphrases, designed to lure customers into a purchase. The fact that the terms seemed to be substantive claims, however, is what primarily motivated advertising law makers to attempt to remedy the situation with adjustments to advertising laws.
 
In today's world, there are still many undefined terms which are used by businesses in order to better manipulate customers. "Light" stands out as one of the primary such terms, used because of its variety of possible meanings.
 
 
To the consumer, "light" could imply anything from "low calories" to "less thickness," and advertisers have no qualms about taking advantage of such variable meanings. Unless advertising laws are changed in order to better regulate terms such as "light," their use will likely continue for a long time to come, not least because they are still effective.
 
 
Specific terms, such as "organic," will always likely encounter some kind of block through advertising law, as they refer to elements which should clearly be policed. But as long as there are other terms out there which cannot be lawfully defined, because to do so would be to infringe on aspects of free speech, then there will always be undefined terms used to manipulate consumers through advertising.